| russell_kirk’s_american_conservatism_–_allen_mendenhall.pdf |
| CULTURAL RECOVERY? |
| WHAT IS GOVERNMENT GOOD FOR? |
| NOMINALISM AS STATECRAFT |
| the_flat_plane_of_modernism_-_craig_c._shelton.pdf |
Hans Urs von Balthasar’s critique of the Jesuit philosopher Joseph Maréchal centered on transcendental Thomism's method of using Kantian epistemology to validate traditional metaphysics. While Balthasar appreciated Maréchal’s bold synthesis, he ultimately argued that the method overly intellectualized revelation and subordinated the objective mystery of divine beauty to subjective, human reasoning. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Balthasar’s engagement and critique of Maréchal’s methodology unfolded through several key tenets:
Balthasar’s engagement and critique of Maréchal’s methodology unfolded through several key tenets:
- The Method of "Transposition": Balthasar acknowledged that Maréchal performed a monumental service by attempting to translate Kantian transcendentalism into Scholastic ontology. However, he viewed this synthesis as a dangerous accommodation that shifted the starting point of theology from God's self-revelation to the subjective conditions of human consciousness. [1, 2]
- Priority of Objective Aesthetics: For Balthasar, truth is encountered first as an objective, awe-inspiring form (the Gestalt) that demands beholding, not just conceptual deduction. He feared that Maréchal's "transcendental method" reduced the dramatic encounter with the living God into an exercise of logical, philosophical extrapolation. [1, 2, 3]
- Inherent Christological Constriction: Balthasar critiqued the tendency in Maréchal (and his inheritors like Karl Rahner) to make human intellectual transcendence (Vorgriff) the primary lens for understanding grace and the beatific vision. For Balthasar, grace, human nature, and truth cannot be properly understood apart from the historically revealed, concrete reality of Jesus Christ. [1, 2, 3]
- Ecclesial Differences: Balthasar’s own theology (such as his massive trilogy) prioritized drama, theological aesthetics, and the Church as the context for divine revelation. He argued against the transcendentalist tendency to fold the supernatural order entirely into the natural dynamism of human intelligence, favoring instead the distinct, gratuitous initiative of God’s love. [1, 2, 3, 4]
RSS Feed
